I previously posted on reasonable legal measures to counter this country’s massive problem with gun violence. Quoting myself:
In the wake of the mass shooting and murder at the Pulse night club in Orlando, there has been a renewed call for restrictive gun legislation. And some response. Vis, a recent Facebook posting:
Nobody added comments to my post, but a link I posted to Facebook received some response. A screen shot captures a summary, omitting 22 additional comments.
Here is a transcription from the above image:
Steven Breed So back to the first bullet point then: How does it reduce gun deaths?
John Blanton It does not.
Steven Breed Now I’m confused. Does it work in conjunction with the other bullets to reduce them? What is it supposed to do?
John Blanton Steve, because you have shown so much interest in this topic, I am now encouraged to give it the full attention it deserves. Stand by for another Skeptical Analysis post.
Hence this post. To recap, following is my current (revised since the original post) bullet list:
- Firearms must be registered. Yeah, yeah, this is a preamble for taking away your guns. Get over it.
- Severe restrictions on the carrying of guns. If you want to handle your weapon anywhere outside your home, anywhere besides a shooting range or a hunting location, you’re going to need a permit, and to obtain that permit you’re going to need to demonstrate you have a good business reason for carrying a gun on the street.
- Severe penalties for violations. You don’t register your gun, the government can seize it, you won’t get it back, ever. Carry your weapon on the street without the proper permit, and you lose it. Besides, you are going to jail. And you will receive no compensation from the government.
- Sever penalties for using a gun in the commission of a crime. These laws exist and are enforceable. Penalties can be increased.
- The need for an automatic weapon must be demonstrated before such a weapon can be used outside the home. Gun people like to pick words over what is an automatic weapon, but as an engineer, any machine that operates itself is by definition automatic. Any weapon that reloads itself is automatic.
- Automatic weapons will not be authorized for hunting.
- Guns being transported must be locked up. We had these laws in Texas for years. You’re going hunting? You need to keep your weapons in the trunk of the car until you get where you’re going.
- It will be illegal to transfer a gun from one person’s ownership to another’s without a proper background check.
- It will be illegal to lend a gun to somebody who does not have the right to possess a gun.
- Violation of gun laws will result in the forfeiture of the right of ownership for life.
- Pistols will be regarded as exceptional weapons, requiring additional restrictions for ownership.
Steve’s question is “Does it work in conjunction with the other bullets to reduce them? What is it supposed to do?” I was hoping Steve would have figured that one out, but I am prepared to do the legwork and outline how registration of firearms will lend itself to reducing gun fatalities. Not being a lawyer or legal scholar by any measure, I am sure to get various points wrong. Challenges and corrections are solicited.
- When a gun is registered it becomes associated with an individual.
- If an individual registered as a gun owner is convicted of a felony, especially a felony involving violence, all guns registered to that individual become subject to confiscation without reimbursement. These guns become the property of some government agency.
- If a registered gun from 2 above cannot be located, then the gun will be placed on a watch list.
- Any attempt to transfer possession (ownership) of the illegal weapon will incur criminal charges.
- The person found in possession of the illegal weapon will be prosecuted.
- If a registered weapon is stolen it will be recorded as an illegal weapon, with criminal penalties attached to its subsequent possession.
- The above procedures will reduce the free circulation of weapons and will also provide government authorities the ability to remove illegal weapons from circulation.
- An obvious result of the above is that a gun removed from circulation will not shortly become involved in death or injury to somebody. People legally possessing a gun will be dissuaded from illegally selling, lending, or giving the gun to somebody who should not have it.
All this may seem minor, and somebody is going to argue that it places undue burden on legitimate gun owners at very little accomplished toward reducing gun violence. The point is conceded, except for the “undue” part. The burden is due and will become part of the cost of gun ownership.
A full transcript of the Facebook exchange is available on request. Again, comments and suggestions are solicited. If you are reading this from a Facebook link, comment in the section below rather than on Facebook. This saves me the trouble of transferring Facebook comments to this posting.